Car Brands - Worst Brands of MY 2004

The Least Reliable and Durable Car Brands of Model Year 2004 by CR's 2010 List of Used Cars to Avoid

This page lists the worst car brands of model year 2004 by two measures, both of which employ Consumer Reports' list of Used Cars to Avoid. Both measures use the 2004 models on the 2010 list of Cars to Avoid, when the 2004 cars were about 5 ½ years old. 

2004's Worst Car Brands by Share of CR's 2010 list of 2004 Cars to Avoid

The 10 worst car brands (13 byt tie) of 2004 by share of CR's 2010 list of 2004 Cars to Avoid are listed below, together with their corresponding shares.

  • Volkswagen line, accounting for 11.3% of 2004 Cars to Avoid in 2010
  • Chevrolet line, accounting for 9.9%
  • Chrysler line, accounting for 9.9%
  • Dodge line, accounting for 7.0%
  • Ford line, accounting for 7.0%
  • GMC line, accounting for 5.6%
  • Audi line, accounting for 5.6%
  • Mercedes-Benz line, accounting for 5.6%
  • Kia line, accounting for 4.2%
  • Lincoln line, accounting for 4.2%
  • Mercury line (now defunct), accounting for 4.2%
  • Saab line, accounting for 4.2%
  • Nissan line, accounting for 4.2%
2004 was a relatively good year for Chevrolet, as this brand placed only second worst for the model year, in the 5-to-6-year-old age range.
 
The Chevrolet brand leads the list of the worst in model years 1985, 1986, 1993, 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2005, and 2006.
 
The Ford brand leads the list of the worst in model years 1993 and 1994.
 
Noteworthy is that although the Toyota line has more 2004 models rated in Consumer Reports' 2010 reliability tables than does the Chevrolet line (reflecting U.S. consumers' growing disinclination to buy GM vehicles and General Motors' resulting market share reduction), the Chevrolet line accounts for 9.9% of 2004 Cars to Avoid in 2010 and the Toyota line accounts for none.
 
The brands that account for the remaining nearly 17% of 2004 cars on CR's 2010 list are Cadillac, Saturn (now defunct), Jaguar, Buick, Porsche, Mini, Jeep, BMW, Volvo, and Mazda.
 
The following bar graph depicts each brand's share of the 2004 Used Cars to Avoid in 2010 at an approximate age of 5 ½ years.

This is a bar graph of the brand shares of the worst cars of 2004 by CR’s 2010 list of 2004 Used Cars to Avoid. Chart by James Benjamin Bleeker, 01 March 2012.

2004's Worst Car Brands by Number of Brand's 2004 Cars to Avoid Divided by All of Its 2004 Cars Rated in 2010

For this quality measure, we divide the brand's number of 2004 models on CR's 2010 list of Used Cars to Avoid by the number of its 2004 models rated in CR's 2010 Reliability Tables. This computation is done with the intent to garner a rough estimate as to how likely a brand's models will be among the Cars to Avoid at about 5 ½ years.

The 10 (11 by tie) worst 2004 brands by this quality measure are, in descending order (worst first):

  • Jaguar line, with a dividend-divisor ratio of 1/0 based on 0 rated models
  • Audi line, with a quotient value of 2.00 based on 2 rated models
  • Volkswagen line, with a quotient value of 2.00 based on 4 rated models
  • Saturn line (now defunct), with a quotient value of 2.00 based on 1 rated model
  • Chrysler line, with a quotient value of 1.75 based on 4 rated models
  • Saab line, with a quotient value of 1.50 based on 2 rated models
  • Lincoln line, with a quotient value of 1.50 based on 2 rated models
  • Mercury line (now defunct), with a quotient value of 1.50 based on 2 rated models
  • Kia line, with a quotient value of 1.00 based on 3 rated models
  • Buick line, with a quotient value of 1.00 based on 1 rated model
  • Porsche line, with a quotient value of 1.00 based on 1 rated model
The brand quotients for model year 2004 are depicted in the following bar graph.
 
This s a bar graph of 2004’s worst car brands by dividing the number of the brand’s 2004 Cars to Avoid in 2010 by all of its 2004 rated cars in Consumer Reports’ 2010 Reliability Tables. Chart by James Benjamin Bleeker, 01 March 2012.
 
The Vibe, a rebadge of the Matrix, is not included in the above computations.
 
Additional Resources

Best Car Brands by CR's List of Used Cars to Avoid: 1985  1986  1987  1988  1989  1990  1991  1992  1993  1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006 

Worst Car Brands by CR's List of Used Cars to Avoid:  1985  1986  1987  1988  1989  1990  1991  1992  1993  1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006

Best Car Makers by CR's List of Used Cars to Avoid: 1985  1986  1987  1988  1989  1990  1991  1992  1993  1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006

Worst Car Makers by CR's List of Used Cars to Avoid:  1985  1986  1987  1988  1989  1990  1991  1992  1993  1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006

The Best Cars of Each Model Year by Reliability-Durability GPA: 1975  1976  1977  1978  1979  1980  1981  1982  1983  1984  1985  1986  ...  2004  2005

The Worst Cars of Each Model Year by Reliability-Durability GPA: 1980  1981  1982  1983  1984  1985  1986  ...  2004  2005 

The Best Car Brands of Each Model Year by Reliability-Durability GPA: 1985  1986 ...  2004  2005

The Worst Car Brands of Each Model Year by Reliability-Durability GPA: 1985  1986 ...  2004  2005

The Best Car Manufacturers of Each Model Year by Reliability-Durability GPA: 1985  1986 ...  2004  2005

The Worst Car Manufacturers of Each Model Year by Reliability-Durability GPA: 1985  1986 ...  2004  2005

For additional car quality information, visit www.AutoOnInfo.net and CarsOnInfo.net.

In particular, for additional durability information, see:

http://www.AutoOnInfo.net/SharesOfHighMileageVehicles.aspx 
http://CarsOnInfo.net/ToyotaAgeEquivalents.aspx 
http://CarsOnInfo.net/ToyotaMileageEquivalents.aspx 
http://CarsOnInfo.net/Top25OfAutoonInfosHighMileageRoster.aspx

www.CarQualityInfo.net: The car-quality website for the brighter-than-average North American consumer.
 
To help support independent car quality information, shop Amazon.com by clicking a link from this site.
Comments